Not saying she/he isn't pretty... Either way ( me not being a homophobe) the person is pretty. But at the time if you look closely it looks like something's tucked. Idc it is their art.. Either way it is a sexual picture and I'm intrigued. But anyways just wanted to clarify to the guy that decided to talk so much crap about me... Sorry and nice picture!
Well, I'm not the only one to think that at least. I report three or four deviations a day. This one is okay, but vagina close-ups, without any lighting or staging...
I'm not saying the photo or the model isn't beautiful : both are gorgeous, it's a beautiful shot : soft skin, sexy pose, charming eyes... Yet I think some other deviations of this artist are more artistic.
And I'm agree with that, I've seen beautiful nude photos more artistics than this. But I've seen photos which only appeared nude women just posing,without any special detail. And those are the ones I don't like.
I can agree with you on this. The photo itself is good but I wouldn't qualify it as an 'artistic nude'. Maybe a glamour shot or something in that area but an artistic nude is a push to me. As for pictures of simply naked women without staging...I loathe that shit and when it make the 'most popular' list it burns me a bit.
Glamour shot, exactly. You got the word. The kind of shot on pin-up calendars, that's it. Glamour shot. And yeah, seeing some bad quality naked shots (not this one, again, I don't want to be rude) on the first time is a bit annoying. Just keep reporting, you know. There are sites for those.